Column / Report / Other Papers

[Research Reports] China and the Joint Statement on Xinjiang and Hong Kong

09-15-2021
Jun Kumakura (Associate Professor, Hosei University)
  • twitter
  • Facebook

Research Group on 'China' FY2021-#1

"Research Reports" are compiled by participants in research groups set up at the Japan Institute of International Affairs, and are designed to disseminate, in a timely fashion, the content of presentations made at research group meetings or analyses of current affairs. The "Research Reports" represent their authors' views. In addition to these "Research Reports", individual research groups will publish "Research Bulletins" covering the full range of the group's research themes.

Introduction

On June 22, 2021, the United Nations Human Rights Council issued a joint statement of concern about the human rights situations in Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Tibet1. The statement was signed by 44 countries, including Western countries, Japan and others that recognize the Republic of China (Taiwan), and was read out by the Canadian ambassador (see the list at the end of this report for details of the countries that signed the statement). In response, the representative of Belarus issued a statement in defense of China on the same day, and the number of countries that signed that statement reached 69, mainly from Africa and the Middle East (including Palestine; see below)2. According to China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, more than 90 countries in addition to those that officially signed support China3. This means that there are more than twice as many countries that support China as those that express concern.

China is gaining momentum due to its superiority in numbers.

Such division in the UN Human Rights Council is not new. In July 2019, 22 countries issued a joint statement condemning China's policies in Xinjiang, while 37 countries signed a joint statement in defense of China. In October 2020, 39 countries signed a statement criticizing China's Xinjiang policy, while 45 countries signed a statement defending China4. In June 2020, 27 countries, including Japan, expressed their opposition to the introduction of the Hong Kong National Security Maintenance Law, while 53 countries expressed their support5. In each of these confrontations, China's advocates have outnumbered the other side, and it goes without saying that the Chinese side gained momentum as a result.

Initially, the Chinese side merely expressed its firm opposition to interference in China's internal affairs under the pretext of human rights in response to criticism mainly from Western countries. But since the beginning of 2021, it has taken a stronger stance in criticizing the human rights problems of Western countries. At a regular press conference held by China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs the day after the most recent round of statements (23 June 2021), spokesperson Zhao Lijian made the following statement:

"[S]ome Western countries like Canada, the US and the UK style themselves as "human rights judges and lecturers," but choose to turn a blind eye to or downplay their own serious human rights issues. The track records of certain countries are beyond appalling: persecution of indigenous children, widespread police violence, deep-seated racism, proliferation of firearms, frequent occurrence of anti-Semitic, anti-Muslim, anti-African and anti-Asian remarks and incidents, military interventions that lead to serious humanitarian disaster and unilateral coercive measures that violate the basic human rights in other countries. With such a woeful record, what right do they have to judge the human rights situation in other countries? We urge these countries to take a hard look at themselves in the mirror, deeply repent their wrongdoing, take concrete steps to address their own serious human rights problems...6"

In particular, China is pursuing the issue of killing of indigenous children in Canada, which read out the joint statement that expressed concern over the human rights. On 22 June 2021, the very same day that the battle of statements took place, Jiang Dan, China's minister in Geneva, along with Russia, Belarus, North Korea, Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Sri Lanka and others, issued another joint statement. The statement addressed the discovery of the remains of more than 200 children at the site of an aboriginal boarding school in Canada and urged Canada to "immediately stop its human rights violations"7. China is now repudiating the criticisms of Western countries head-on and is launching a counter offensive by taking advantage of Western countries' own languages.

Background of the growing support for China

There are various factors behind the growing support for China, including the fact that China has steadily increased the number of countries with which it can cooperate in UN diplomacy, and the strong expectations among developing countries for Chinese investment related to the Belt and Road Initiative and support in dealing with new coronavirus infections. However, a more fundamental factor that I would like to point out in this paper is that China's policies toward Xinjiang and Hong Kong are themselves undergoing changes.

Over the past few years, China has been criticized by the West for its policies in Xinjiang, such as placing ethnic minorities in "re-education facilities" (vocational training centers), tightening restrictions on childbearing and forcibly mobilizing laborers, as well as for tightening controls in Hong Kong and introducing the National Security Maintenance Law. All these policies were changes to the status quo implemented by the Chinese Communist regime based on its own internal logic, which caused severe friction in Hong Kong and was rejected by Western public opinion8.

However, these attempts to change the status quo had already subsided by the end of 2020, and a thorough monitoring system is being put in place. Xinjiang has been cut off from the outside world, protests in Hong Kong have been suppressed and, to varying degrees, these regions have entered a state of controlled silence. From China's point of view, this has made it easier for more countries to agree with China's point of view by preventing new disturbances that might give other countries an "excuse" for condemnation.

Of course, the accusations against China continue, based on newly revealed testimonies, accusations, and cases pertaining to its continued repressive rule in Xinjiang and Hong Kong. At the same time, though, China is stepping up its propaganda. Since the spring of 2021 in particular, propaganda activities praising China's Xinjiang policy have been carried out in various parts of the world to counteract the criticism that China has received to date, which from China's point of view has no basis in fact. It emphasizes the happy lives of ethnic minorities who have undergone vocational training and shows cotton fields where mechanization has made it unnecessary for people to pick cotton by hand9. A kind of parallel world based on China's claims is spreading beyond the scope of China as a single country and gaining purchase across the international community.

List of signatories to joint statements on June 22, 2021

(Prepared by the author based on the materials in notes 1 and 2)

(Alphabetical order by country name)

Statement of Concern

Statement of Support

1

Albania

Algeria

2

Australia

Antigua and Barbuda

3

Austria

Bahrain

4

Belgium

Bangladesh

5

Belize

Belarus

6

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Benin

7

Bulgaria

Bolivia

8

Canada

Burkina Faso

9

Croatia

Burundi

10

Czech Republic

Cambodia

11

Denmark

Cameroon

12

Estonia

Central Africa

13

France

China

14

Finland

Comoros

15

Germany

Congo

16

Haiti

Cuba

17

Honduras

Djibouti

18

Iceland

Dominica

19

Ireland

North Korea

20

Israel

Egypt

21

Italy

Equtorial Guinea

22

Japan

Eritrea

23

Latvia

Ethiopia

24

Liechtenstein

Gabon

25

Lithuania

Gambia

26

Luxembourg

Grenada

27

Marshall Islands

Guinea

28

Monaco

Guinea-Bissau

29

Netherland

Iran

30

New Zealand

Iraq

31

Norway

Kiribati

32

Palau

Kyrgyzstan

33

Poland

Laos

34

Portugal

Lebanon

35

Romania

Libya

36

San Marino

Mali

37

Slovakia

Mauritania

38

Slovenia

Morocco

39

Spain

Mozambique

40

Sweden

Myanmar

41

Switzerland

Nepal

42

Ukraine

Nicaragua

43

United Kingdom

Niger

44

United States of America

Nigeria

45

Pakistan

46

Palestine

47

Papua New Guinea

48

Russia

49

Sao Tome and Principe

50

Saudi Arabia

51

Serbia

52

Sierra Leone

53

Solomon Islands

54

Somalia

55

South Sudan

56

Sri Lanca

57

Sudan

58

Suriname

59

Syria

60

Tajikistan

61

Togo

62

Tonga

63

Tunisia

64

United Arab Emirates

65

Uganda

66

Venezuela

67

Yemen

68

Zambia

69

Zimbabwe




1The U.S. Mission to International Organizations in Geneva, "Joint Statement on the Human Rights Situation in Xinjiang," 22 June 2021. https://geneva.usmission.gov/2021/06/22/joint-statement-on-the-human-rights-situation-in-xinjiang/.

2The Chinese Mission to International Organizations in Geneva, "Joint Statement on the Human Rights Situation in Xinjiang," 22 June 2021. http://www.china-un.ch/chn/dbdt/t1886464.htm?fbclid=IwAR3 BJ7mg0qrgf_hj9X0517TjrUuU9VVDRFdjm-ioZauyABNphhQclT4AD7Y (English version of the same at: http://www.china-un.ch/eng/dbdt/t1886467.htm?fbclid=IwAR2 qLFwrVreyhZMLWX3dd_GrxhenNrybDh4_p7Dc6jT3Z7_dFHEK1j4bL4I).

3Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China, "June 23, 2021, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Speaker Zhao Lijian Presides Over Regular Press Conference," 23 June 2021. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/fyrbt_673021/t1886125.shtml (English version of the same at: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/2511_665403/t1886179.shtml).

4See below for a breakdown of the countries that participated in the July 2019 and October 2020 statements. Catherine Putz, "Which Countries Are For or Against China's Xinjiang Policies?" The Diplomat, 15 July 2019. https://thediplomat.com/2019/07/which-countries-are-for-or-against-chinas-xinjiang-policies/. Catherine Putz, "2020 Edition: Which Countries Are For or Against China's Xinjiang Policies?" The Diplomat, 9 October 2020. https://thediplomat.com/2020/10/2020-edition-which-countries-are-for-or-against-chinas-xinjiang-policies/. Note that the final number of countries endorsing the July 2019 China advocacy statement was 50. Delegation of the Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the United Nations, "50 Countries Co-signed Letter to President of UN Human Rights Council and UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in Support of China's Position on Xinjiang-related Issues," 26 July 2019. http://www.china-un.ch/chn/dbdt/t1683827.htm (English version of the same is available at: http://www.china-un.ch/eng/dbdt/t1683829.htm).

5Dave Lawler, "The 53 countries supporting China's crackdown on Hong Kong," Axios, 3 July 2020. https://www.axios.com/countries-supporting-china-hong-kong-law-0ec9bc6c-3aeb-4af0-8031-aa0f01a46a7c.html.

6Same as Note 3.

7Delegation of the People's Republic of China to the Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the United Nations Office at Geneva and Other International Organizations in Switzerland, "Joint Statement Delivered by China on Behalf of a Group of Countries on Human Rights Issues in Canada at the 47th Session of the Human Rights Council," 22 June 2021. http://www.china-un.ch/chn/dbdt/t1886014.htm (English version of the same at: http://www.china-un.ch/eng/dbdt/t1886023.htm).

8I pointed this out in my article in last year's report. "National Unity under Xi Jinping: Focusing on Xinjiang and Hong Kong Policies," Report of the Study Group on "Challenges Facing the Xi Jinping Administration," Japan Institute of International Affairs, 2021, p. 45. https://www.jiia.or.jp/pdf/research/R02_China/07-kumakura.pdf

9As an example, Embassy of the People's Republic of China in Japan, "Chinese Embassy in Japan Holds 'Beautiful Xinjiang' Online Exchange Meeting," 13 June 2021. http://www.china-embassy.or.jp/jpn/dsgxx/t1883571.htm.